PRESS RELEASE

B.C. Government wants massive Shuswap mining project to forgo federal review

A massive zinc mine proposed in the upper Adams River drainage is moving into the environment assessment phase and the province of B.C. has requested that the project skip the federal environmental review process (see release below). The Upper Adams River is a sensitive, salmon-bearing watershed and efforts continue to re-vitalize the salmon run which was nearly wiped out nearly one hundred years ago due to a splash dam built by the Adams River Lumber Company. “The proposed processing of the ore at the mine site has the potential to impact both the threatened Bull trout in Oliver Creek and the salmon downstream in the Upper Adams River. We believe that it is imperative that this proposed mine project receive the most stringent review possible,” explained Jim Cooperman, Shuswap Environmental Action Society president. “We urge the federal government to ensure  that this proposed mine receive a federal environmental assessment,” Cooperman added.

    The Ruddock Creek mining project is located high above the Upper Adams River

Although the proposed mine would be underground, the processing of the ore would require the storage of tailings above ground storage and in an alpine lake, which has the potential to pollute watercourses downstream. As well, the mine project is located at a very high elevation where the snowpack is very deep and there are nearby glaciers. Consequently, the potential also exists for problems related to avalanches and snowmelt.

The provincial review process has a history of approving projects that are not environmentally responsible, such as the Prosperity Mine (Fish Lake), which was approved provincially but was turned down twice in the federal review. It is clear that the provincial process is not adequate for a project of this size and scope that has the potential to impact a relatively pristine watershed that is home to salmon and other key species.

SEAS also urges the public to get involved and to use the opportunity to provide comments to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency by the June 19th deadline.

Send your letter urging the government to require a federal assessment to RuddockCreek@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Learn more about the project by downloading and reading the Project Description

Mine review sparks debate

by  Barb Brouwer – Salmon Arm Observer
posted Jun 5, 2014

A request by the province to substitute a federal environmental review of a proposed mine with a single provincial review has raised concerns and differing opinions.

Shuswap Environmental Action Society president Jim Cooperman was given a guided tour in 2008 of the Ruddock Creek zinc mine, high above the headwaters of the Adams River.

“At that point they were going to do all the processing a long way away in an area that didn’t post any environmental risks,” he says. “Since then, they’ve changed the plans.”

While he describes the plan by mine owner Imperial Metals of Vancouver as basically a good one, Cooperman says his main concern is the tailings to be stored there for the first six months of operation going into Light Lake.

Cooperman’s other concern is the fact the mine is located in a heavy snowfall area with a high likelihood  of avalanches, events that he believes could destroy infrastructure and harm the surrounding environment, including Oliver Creek and farther downstream, the Adams River.

Those are all the challenges connected with operating at high elevation and ones that need extreme caution and environmental oversight – from both the province and the federal government, he says.

“The track  record for provincial assessments is that they operate as a rubber stamp,” he says. “As we have seen only too clearly by the approval of the province of Prosperity Mine, which would have destroyed Fish Lake, it was subsequently turned down twice in the federal review process.”

Ramsey Hart of Mining Watch Canada says the non-profit organization was alerted to the province’s request by the Neskonlith Indian Band, which opposes the move because of their traditional use of the area.

He will be asking Ottawa to deny the B.C. government’s request.

“We think federal oversight on key issues is really important due to aboriginal use of the land, potential impacts on fisheries and endangered species – all of which are the responsibility of the federal government,” he says, noting he is also concerned the B.C. timeline is too short at 180 days to do a review and 45 days for a decision to be made, whereas a federal assessment can take a year to two if it is done by a review panel. “We also note that the federal government has held projects to a higher standard.”

But both the government and Imperial Metals say oversight will not be reduced.

“The substituted environmental assessment still covers what must be considered under both a provincial assessment and a federal assessment,” reads a June 3 email from the Ministry of Environment, which maintains substitution allows the assessment process to be conducted more effectively and efficiently. “The province’s businesses, First Nations and communities alike will benefit from the elimination of the duplication involved in having two assessments for a single project, while maintaining strong environmental assessments and aboriginal consultation.”

Steve Robertson, Imperial Metals vice-president corporate affairs, agrees. In responding to Cooperman’s concerns, Robertson says the plan is to minimize “to the extent possible,” the environmental footprint of the mine.

He says the tailings, or leftover rocks, will be mixed with cement and be placed back in the mine. But, he points out, until the mine has been in production for several months, there will be no place to put the tailings.

A dam will be built high on the headwaters of Oliver Creek, right beside the processing plant to contain the initial tailings, Robertson says. Avalanche control will be part of the company’s management plan, both in terms of building infrastructure and control measures, he adds.

Robertson says First Nations concerns are also being addressed.

Comments regarding the mine may be made to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency by the June 19 deadline.

Here is the government notice:

Public Notice
Ruddock Creek Mine Project – Public Comments Invited

May 30, 2014— As part of the strengthened and modernized Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012) put in place to support the government’s Responsible Resource Development Initiative, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) must decide whether a federal environmental assessment is required for the proposed Ruddock Creek Mine Project located in British Columbia (B.C.). To assist it in making its decision, the Agency is seeking comments from the public on the project and its potential effects on the environment.

Substitution Request

The Government of B.C. has requested the substitution of the B.C. environmental assessment process for the CEAA 2012 process if it is determined that an environmental assessment is required. The Agency is also seeking comments on this request.

In considering the Government of B.C.’s request, the federal Minister of the Environment must be satisfied, under CEAA 2012, that:

• the process to be substituted will include a consideration of the factors set out in subsection 19(1) of CEAA 2012;
• the public will be given an opportunity to participate in the environmental assessment;
• the public will have access to records in relation to the environmental assessment to enable their meaningful participation;
• at the end of the environmental assessment, a report will be submitted to the Agency;
• the report will be made available to the public; and
• any other conditions the Minister establishes are or will be met.

The Minister would also establish the following additional conditions for this project:

• the involvement of expert federal departments in the B.C. process;
• B.C. meeting the CEAA 2012 365-day time frame for completing the environmental assessment;
• B.C. conducting procedural aspects of Aboriginal consultation; and
• B.C. making available to Aboriginal groups funding provided by the Agency to support consultation during the substituted environmental assessment.

B.C.’s request is in accordance with a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Agency and the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office to enable efficient and timely use of the CEAA 2012 substitution provisions. The MOU  addresses the processes leading to substitution, the conduct of the substituted environmental assessment and associated Aboriginal consultation, and the coordination of decision-making, monitoring and follow-up after the environmental assessment. The MOU and a Backgrounder on substitution under CEAA 2012 are available on the Agency’s website.

Public Comments

Written comments on the need for a federal environmental assessment and on the substitution request must be submitted by June 19, 2014 to:

Ruddock Creek Mine Project
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
410-701 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1C6
Telephone: 604-666-2431
Fax: 604-666-6990
RuddockCreek@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

To view a summary of the project description or for more information on the project, the substitution request and the environmental assessment process, visit the Agency’s website (Registry reference number 80072). All comments received will be considered public.

The Agency will post its decision on whether a federal environmental assessment is required on its website. A notice of the Minister’s decision on the request for substitution will also be posted on the Agency’s website if it is determined that a federal environmental assessment is required.

The Proposed Project

Ruddock Creek Mining Corporation is proposing the construction, operation, and decommissioning of a new underground zinc-lead mine located between the headwaters of Ruddock Creek and Oliver Creek in the Scrip Range of the Monashee Mountains, approximately 155 kilometres northeast of Kamloops and 28 kilometres east of Avola, British Columbia. The project, as proposed, would have an ore production capacity of 3,000 tonnes per day over an anticipated mine life of eight years.

Below is the news coverage and here is the link to the 14 minute video:

The SEAS Story – A 25 Year Retrospective
A group of conservationists surround a 3.65 metre diameter ‘Seymour giant’ which was slated for logging. A framed copy of the 1993 photo was given to the Minister of Forests’ regional manager, who issued a moratorium that allowed the company to only log half the blocks. After six years of intense advocacy and negotiations, the Upper Seymour River Valley became a provincial park.

Celebrating 25 years of environmental action

by  Barb Brouwer – Salmon Arm Observer

posted May 14, 2014 at 8:00 AM
http://www.saobserver.net/news/259225051.html

Not just talk, but action.

That has been the driving force behind the Shuswap Environmental Action Society (SEAS) that is celebrating 25 years of advocating for the environment.

“I feel like it’s been an amazing amount of effort and time and achievements,” says SEAS president and founding member Jim Cooperman. “It’s basically we worked hard to make conservation an issue here in the Shuswap, and all of our work resulted in achieving the goals that we set.”

SEAS began modestly in 1989, when Cooperman realized there was no organization in the Shuswap dealing with environmental issues.

Cooperman, who had a background in forestry and owned a sawmill, says there was fierce resistance throughout the province to a government plan that would basically privatize the forest industry.

“My knowledge of forestry issues combined with a passion for the environment was one of the catalysts for starting the organization,” he says, noting forest practices were terrible in the ’80s and early ’90s prior to the Forest Practices Code “I got involved in the fight by writing a long brief and presenting it to the minister in Kamloops. And shortly after that we formed SEAS.”

The first big event SEAS hosted was an Earth Day fundraiser at the Salmon Arm Rec Centre in April 1989.

A huge success, it raised enough money to produce the first of three issues of Shuswap Eco-watch, educational newsletters that were distributed in the Observer and Shuswap Market News.

Cooperman estimates 20 to 30 active members formed SEAS, some of whom had been involved in environmental issues in the past – mostly fighting against the uranium exploration that had been planned for Silver Creek.

“The first main issue we tackled was the dumps, because they were burning plastic,” he says, noting the issue also formed the first of many presentations he has made to the Columbia Shuswap Regional District over the years.

The organization also became actively involved with conservation, at a time when parks were scarce.

“SEAS created more than 25,000 hectares of new parks but it took years and years of hard work to get there,” he says. “We cleared routes into the wilderness, produced map brochures to help get people out there to experience wilderness, did a 15-minute video, hired airplanes to take aerial photos and made countless trips into the wilderness, taking various people with us – provincial experts, dignitaries.”

SEAS also campaigned hard for a land-use planning process for the Shuswap.

“Kamloops had the first LRMP (Land and Resource Management Plan) but it only dealt with a small part of the Shuswap,” he says, noting that SEAS undertook a new collaborative role in the subsequent Okanagan-Shuswap LRMP, a long process that included mapping, studies and presentations.

“Then finally, in the last year of the process, it evolves into negotiation and we were successful in that we protected Anstey-Hunakwa and the Upper Seymour River where there is actually an antique forest.”

Cooperman says the antique forest, the rarest in the area and quite likely all of North America, once existed along the full length of the river.

“Most of it had been logged out by the time we got going and we had to get the regional forestry manager to issue a moratorium.”

Through the efforts of SEAS, thousands of hectares of old-growth trees were protected, including an area of Larch Hills.

The organization also fought to halt private sewage effluent outfalls into Shuswap Lake, logging in viewscape areas and development at the mouth of the Adams River. At the same time, SEAS campaigned for the establishment of parks.

“One of our grandest accomplishments is the mapping work we did,” says Cooperman, of the detailed and colourful map of the entire Shuswap watershed and online educational handbook.

“Over the years, we’ve had so many people involved with SEAS; virtually hundreds who have put in their time and effort to support the cause.”

The Shuswap Environmental Action Society (SEAS) recently celebrated its 25^th anniversary with a party that included some great local live music. I helped form SEAS with local activists who had been involved with other local advocacy groups, including the Shuswap Nuclear Action Group, the Shuswap-Thompson River Research and Development Association, and the Shuswap Recycling Society.

 25 years of environmental activism

A Shuswap Passion column for the Shuswap Market News, by Jim Cooperman

At the inaugural meeting in February, 1989, I gave a short speech that included these thoughts, “We are all sick of hearing how we live in a throw-away society, how our forests are being clear-cut at double the rate that they are growing back, how our lakes and rivers are dying from pollution, how our food is full of chemicals that cause cancer and how our governments respond only when the problems reach epidemic proportions. We want to find out how these global problems relate to us here. We hear on the news how poorly the B.C. forests are being managed, but what we need to find out is what forestry problems exist here at the Shuswap.  We need answers, we need to spread the word, we need to take action and we have to fight from the grassroots level up. “

It did not take long after incorporation for the fledgling society to begin taking action. In just its first year, SEAS sponsored a well-attended forestry workshop that included a field trip to recent Larch Hills clearcuts with forest service staff and a local sawmill forester. A very successful Earth Day event at the community centre with speakers, displays and a dance band raised significant funds to publish an educational newspaper, the Shuswap Eco-Watch, with articles on waste dumps, forestry, pesticides, radon gas, recycling, and water quality, an issue that continues to be a major concern.

For the next few years, SEAS focused on developing a sustainable stewardship plan that further evolved into advocacy efforts to improve forestry practices, promote wilderness conservation and push for land use planning. Two more Eco-Watch newspapers were published with colour satellite photos showing where logging was proposed, followed by a series of newspaper columns promoting park creation. Map brochures were published to encourage the public to visit the endangered wilderness areas that needed protection and a video was made called Shuswap Wild with spectacular photography including aerial scenes.

Land use planning began in Kamloops in 1992, which, after three years, resulted in new parks in the Adams Lake area in addition to many others in that region. Finally in 1995, land use planning began in the Okanagan Shuswap, and SEAS conservation efforts evolved from advocacy to process and finally negotiations. The result was 25,000 hectares of new parks, including the Upper Seymour River rainforest and the magnificent Anstey-Arm Hunakwa Lake wilderness area. Additionally, thousands of hectares of old growth forest were set aside and there was direction for vastly improved forest management to better protect non-timber forest values.

In an effort to advocate for lowering the rate of logging, SEAS produced a spatial timber supply analysis in 1994 that clearly showed how there would be little intact forest left after 17 years. The rate of cut was never decreased, which likely contributed to the loss of this region’s major sawmill in Canoe a few years ago.

In 2008, the successful effort to halt the proposed marina and condo development near the mouth of the Adams River resulted in national media coverage. And while we were unable to see the property purchased by the provincial government to be added to Roderick Haig-Brown Park, the current plan for the Cottonwoods Campground includes public access to the beach, restoration of significant fish habitat, removal of the buoys, and a continuation of RV camping.

After SEAS helped change the map of the Shuswap through the creation of new parks, in 2010 it worked with many diverse partners including all levels of government to produce the first map of the Shuswap watershed in a poster format.

Over the 25 years, SEAS has sponsored countless forums on many issues, including lake water quality, pesticides, climate change, watershed management and the tar sands and pipelines. It helped initiate the Regional District parks system and has investigated the impacts of poor logging practices that resulted in numerous debris torrents that have devastated local infrastructure.  After 25 years, SEAS has left an impressive legacy of new parks and improved environmental protection measures.